With the unofficial end of summer upon us, five films vie for remnants of your summer movie bucks. Disaster Movie, Babylon A.D., Hamlet 2, Traitor, and College all open this weekend. It would appear that there is a film for everyone in that smorgasbord of fresh titles, and each will most likely rake in respective box office numbers. This weekend closes a surprisingly profitable summer for Hollywood, expected to make around 4 billion dollars by the close of the summer season. Down slightly from the record setting summer last year, which grossed over 4.16 billion dollars. This summer has proved that Hollywood is not quite yet completely out of new ideas. We here at Surreelfilm will be publishing our summer recap at the end of this week in case you missed anything. Until then take your pick of movie genres this week, or indulge your inner sports fan and sit on your coach and watch the opening weekend of college football, like me.

UPDATE: Ben Stiller's Tropic Thunder comfortably edged out Vin Diesel's Babylon A.D. for the top spot this past weekend, bringing in $14.3 million and $12 million respectively. Disaster Movie opened at $6.9 million.

The Wrestler, staring Mickey Rourke, is building strong buzz going into it's pending debut at the Venice Film Festival on September 5th, and again two days later at the Toronto International Film Festival. Directed by Darren Aronofsky of Requiem for a Dream and Pi, The Wrestler follows the story of Randy "the ram" Robinson (Rourke), an ex-professional wrestler, forced into retirement by severe heart problems. Living with an aging stripper (Marisa Tomei) and her son, Robinson is drawn back into the sport by the prospect of a rematch with old nemesis the Ayatollah (Ernest Miller).

With whispers of oscar-worthy status in the air, The Wrestler is almost certain to get snatched up by a studio specialty division and dropped into a theater near you as soon as possible. Nicolas Cage was originally attached to play the title role, but left the project for undisclosed reasons. Director Darren Aronofsky was recently confirmed for MGM's 2010 reboot of the Robocop franchise.

Rourke and his on-set trainer, real-life wrestler Afa Anoa'i


Bolstered by the upcoming Criterion release of Wes Anderson’s Bottle Rocket, I finally took the time to check out the film, and discovered a classic effort that Martin Scorsese has labeled as one of the top-ten films of the 1990s.

The Skinny: As Anderson’s first full length feature, 1996’s Bottle Rocket is an immensely enjoyable and entertaining farce of a heist movie that demonstrates many of the trademarks and quirks that have come to define the Anderson’s films. It features brothers Luke, Owen, and yes even the phantom Andrew Wilson, alongside actors Robert Musgrave and James Caan. The film opens as Owen Wilson’s character Dignan helps Luke Wilson’s Anthony to “break out” of a voluntary-stay mental care facility. After meeting up with mutual friend Bob, played by Musgrave, the threesome proceed to set out on a series of misadventures in their efforts to become big-time criminals. The film deals with a number of themes ranging from brotherhood and love, to depression, and carries on with the same innocent sense of humor that shines throughout all of Wes Anderson’s writing. Bottle Rocket is easily the most accessible of any of Anderson’s films, and can therefore serve as both a perfect introduction for Anderson neophytes, or as a refreshing change of pace for dedicated fans.
+/- Full Review

Friends Anthony and Dignan, played by brothers Luke and Owen Wilson respectively, serve as the central characters of the film, while third friend Bob exists on the periphery of their three-man “team”. Anthony is a twenty-something who checked himself into a mental facility upon the realization that he was completely miserable with the state of his life and utterly hopeless. His character is recovering gradually from his bout with depression, but is actually a closet idealist, as illustrated by his love-at-first-sight affection for Inez, the Paraguayan maid of a hotel where the three stay. Dignan is a fundamentally insecure guy who is prone to jealousy and covers up for it by being extremely energetic and over-the-top. He desperately wants to be the mastermind of the group, but his ridiculous schemes hold nothing but empty promises that usually end up fucking things up for one or more of the participants. Bob has been beat up and degraded by his older brother, played by Andrew Wilson, for his entire life and desperately wants to be a member of the group, but his paranoia leads him to suspect the other two of wanting to cut him out of the deal at any given opportunity. His is drafted as the group’s getaway driver, as he is the only one that owns a car.

The themes of Bottle Rocket are largely consistent with the hallmarks of Wes Anderson’s works, but with a few key differences. While the main characters are all damaged and fragile in their own way, the film lacks the sense of tragedy displayed in many of Anderson’s other films. However, sympathy for the characters is by no means diminished, as the woes that befall them are ultimately much more grounded than the extreme absurdity of later efforts like The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou. Of course, that’s not to say that the plot doesn’t have it’s moments of delightful absurdity. As to the film’s sense of humor, Anderson’s use of understatement is masterfully intact. In one the opening sequences Luke Wilson explains to a sorority-type girl the powerful motivations and realizations that lead him to seek professional help, only for her to respond, “you’re really complicated aren’t you?” He replies, “I try not to be.” One other thematic constant of Anderson’s films that makes an appearance is the respected middle-aged male who turns out to be a complete fraud. Here the character is James Caan’s Mr Henry, who is the owner of the lawn and landscaping service that serves as the cover for the criminal organization from which Dignan draws all of his inspiration. Interestingly, one Anderson staple missing from this story is the prevalence of smoking, and an escapist embrace of drug use.

In terms of the cinematography and production style employed in Bottle Rocket, it’s much the same story in that many of the established Anderson elements are present, but not all. Anderson’s pension for unique staging was prevalent from the first scene, and he utilizes close-ups and quick cuts throughout the film in order to create a playful and dynamic rhythm to all of the sequences. This sense of rhythm and style is further buoyed by Anderson’s oddball music selection, which is just a sharp here as ever. Missing is the vivid pastel color palette of his later work, but this can be most easily explained by a comparatively small budget. However, fear not, as the use of Futura Bold font for all credits is present and accounted for. (sigh of relief)

Bottle Rocket is a refreshing look back to the Wes Anderson of yesteryear, and a satisfyingly entertaining romp to boot. Many critics of Anderson have felt that his films have become progressively more bizarre since Rushmore, and that his characters have become less and less relatable. While this criticism is probably fair, I have continued to be a fan of his work through last year’s Darjeeling Limited, and will continue to be until some point in the future when he actually goes fucking crazy. And even then I’ll probably still give him a chance. Bottle Rocket is not only Anderson at his most unfiltered, but perhaps his most human as well, and is therefore an easy recommendation to any fan of quality cinema.

So.... what do a forgettable Indiana Jones sequel and a 1994 MacGyver TV movie have in common? The same horrible ending! Thanks a lot George Lucas.


To say that the character Ant-Man is obscure in the minds of the general public is an understatement. In a recent interview with Wizard Universe director Edgar Wright reaffirmed his commitment to bringing his "A-game" for one of marvel's "D-list" heroes.

Currently working on the film's second draft, the Hot Fuzz and Shaun of the Dead director admits, "The whole raison d'etre of the piece for me and my thing has always been to take something that would seem to be uncool and make it really cool and that's certainly the case with British cops in Hot Fuzz. To take the most seemingly kind of underwhelming concept and make something really cool out of it—I always liked that premise." His pedigree speaks for itself, but I'd say he's got his work cut out for him.

There have been three Ant-men in the history of Marvel's cannon and Wright's script purports to include all three of them via a series of flashes between the 60s and 80s. Ant-man is tentatively set for a 2011 release.

Sony pictures has announced that a big screen adaptation of Wildstorm comics' The Boys is in the works. The super-violent series follows the exploits of a squad of superhero CIA agents who are charged with the duty of keeping watch on other superheroes, and using deadly force whenever necessary.

As interesting as this property sounds, I'm very nervous as to whether or not the pro-PG13 Dark Knight copycat machine will allow it to be made in the horrifically R-rated fashion that the materials calls for. And second, writers Matt Manfredi and Phil Hay of Aeon Flux and The Tuxedo are handling the adaptation, which doesn't bode well for my confidence either. No director has been attached the project.



All misgivings aside, this will be an interesting one to follow as it progresses. Here's hoping for a pleasant surprise.

Hot on the tales of seeing Watchmen and Star Trek, the director/actor/producer extraorinare Kevin Smith confirmed yesterday that he has seen a cut of Peter Jackson and Guillermo del Toro's The Hobbit.

Speaking of del Toro's directing Kevin said, "to say that it was masterfully done would be a gross understatement. This is the film of the fucking century. Somewhere J.R.R. Tolkien just blew a load in his grave!"

Smith had this to say about his early viewing of the film:

"You know, it just goes to show that great films really make themselves. Even though the script hasn't been written and the thing doesn't even launch for three more years, it's already a masterpiece. It's just a shame that hollywood has to operate on such bullshit bloated production schedules you know? Just let the people see the goddamn movie already!"


UPDATE: Mr. Smith has since been hospitalized after suffering a major stroke. Doctors report discovering an inoperable brain tumor and his family has confirmed that he's been suffering severe hallucinations for weeks.

Director Spike Jonze's Where the Wild Things Are has been in a state of limbo ever since news broke earlier this year of screaming children running from test screenings and a very unhappy Warner Brothers. Since then news has been very tight on the rumored reshoots and the overall status of the film. However, in a recent interview with Variety's Anne Thompson producer Gary Goetzman asserted that the studio stood behind Jonze, saying:
"We'd like to find a common ground that represents Spike's vision but still offers a film that really delivers for a broad-based audience. We obviously still have a challenge on our hands. But I wouldn't call it a problem, simply a challenge. No one wants to turn this into a bland, sanitized studio movie. This is a very special piece of material and we're just trying to get it right."
He went on to say that the live-action animatronic wild things that Jonze had intended on using had just not worked in context of filming in the Australian jungle and that the film was being redone with CGI. "CG can always look right," he said.

Jonze and Where the Wild Things Are has always struck me as an odd couple. It's a bit confusing that any studio would expect the director of movies like Adaptation (2002) and Being John Malkovich (1999) to pump out a family movie with wide-spread appeal. The worst part is, while the original vision might not have been for everyone, I think I might have really liked it. I'm hopeful for a positive ending the this whole debacle, but lamenting the fact that I'll never get to see it in its original form.

I think I have a relatively open and accepting view of most movies. I like my fair share and hate quite a few as well. It takes a truly unique film for me to just flat out refuse to acknowledge its existence. I begrudgingly open long-closed wounds and have assembled a list of the films that I simply refuse to acknowledge. I am, and the world is, better off just forgetting these films.

9) Batman and Robin

The more Christopher Nolan Batman films that come out, the more I want to forget this movie. The casting is abysmal, the script is preposterous, the sets look like shitty amusement park rides, and we are subjected to the Governor of California uttering such famous lines such as these. (Youtube video) . I think you can all see why I like to forget this movie.



+/- Full List


8) GodFather Pt 3

The crippling end to an epic movie franchise. This is the theatrical equivalent to Cooper Manning. You know, the Manning brother without a super bowl ring.

7) Super Babies: Baby Geniuses 2

A movie about super intelligent babies that can talk. This is the sequel. It makes me uncomfortable to think of the people that thought this was a good idea, and oddly enough it stares Jon Voight.

6) Indiana Jones and Kingdom of the Crystal Skull


From CGI groundhogs to ridiculously helpful monkeys, this movie drips with absurdity. Not only does Indiana Jones survive a nuclear explosion, he does so while hiding inside a lead-lined refrigerator which is magically propelled to a safe distance, even though everything else within the blast zone, lead or otherwise, is completely vaporized. Shia LaBeouf is supposed to be a 50s greaser a la Rebel Without a Cause, but he comes off as a bi-curious punk while Cate Blanchett portrays one of the most boring villains ever, who may have psychic powers, although she never actually gets them to work. And don't even get me started on the ending.

5) Every Land before time after the first one

The dinosaurs are going extinct in the first one, they stretch that out into 13 movies. Seriously, 13 movies, I looked it up.

4) Hulk (Ang Lee)

Never has any movie ever made me yearn for a low-budget 70’s television show more. At least the TV show had good stories and at least one heart warming moment per episode. Ang Lee is quite possible the only man of earth that can make a movie based on a giant green monster wreaking havoc and blowing stuff up so utterly boring. He failed to make the most destructive superhero at all exciting. Impressive in its own regard I suppose. I am just happy I can replace this image of the hulk with the 2008 Edward Norton reboot. Norton’s portrayal may not be perfect but it's enough to get me to forget this monstrosity.

3) Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (remake)

Watching this movie was like watching my childhood being raped. I would not have near as many problems with it as I do, if I wouldn’t have grown up watching the original as a child. Going from Gene Wilder as a lovable kook to Johnny Depp as an obvious child molestor really shook me up. It just makes things a lot easier and less confusing if I just pretend like it doesn’t exist

2) Spiderman 3

What a cinematic cluster fuck. Spiderman 3 took a compelling narrative that had been building over two fairly good installments and completely tore it to shreds for the sake of a toy line that needed as many villains as possible. Not only did this movie take the Goblin plot line, which had been set up for a dramatic conclusion, and turn Harry Osbourne into a big douche bag on a flying snow board, but it absolutely gutted the venom story line, painfully forcing venom into the movie at the last minute via studio intervention. Also, Peter Parker has a dance scene.

1) Rocky 5

This movie does not exist

Famed writer Chuck Palahniuk recently announced on his blog that the rights have been optioned to a movie adaptation of his novel Rant. Previous big screen adaptations of Palahniuk's work include 1999's Fight Club and 2008's Choke, which releases at the end of next month. Rant follows the life of Buster Landru "Rant" Casey in a dystopian future in which urban dwellers are divided into the privileged day-timers and maligned night-timers. The night-timers participate in the practice of Party Crashing, a form of demolition derby, and apparently there's a rabies epidemic thrown into the mix as well.

Choke stars Sam Rockwell as a colonial times reenacting sex addict.

Dear Jeff Goldblum,

I feel that this letter has been a long time in the making, but it is imperative at this time of crossroads in your life that I get some important things off my chest. In the words of Conan O’Brien, “the eye always goes to Goldblum.”

+/- Nostalgic Musings

Well, allow me to start with my earliest recollections of your career. Like many kids of my generation my first introduction to the quirky Pittsburgh native named Jeff Goldblum was as Dr. Ian Malcolm in 1993’s Jurassic Park. I listened Dr. Malcolm’s take on chaos theory without knowing exactly what he was saying, but even as a child I knew. I knew there was something very strange about that weird actor Jeff Goldblum.

Via the continued successes of Independence Day and The Lost World: Jurassic Park, you were able to cement yourself in my young mind not as just some oddball supporting character type, but as a “big time actor”, or at least what I understood one to be. Your quirks played very well against more sobering cast members, and provided for some very subtle humor that is both hard to write, and even harder to fake.

Later, with the the advent of your iMac marketing campaign in the late 1990s, your presence had shifted away from just my favorite summer movies, to an almost omnipotent state by which you were now invading my living room as well. These commercials not only showcased that endearing wit and quirkiness that I had already grown to love, but they also confirmed a sneaking suspicion that had begun to mount after seeing your successive movies..... and that was that you were in real life just as strange as the characters you portrayed on screen. A very weird man indeed.

And then the dreamed died. Or so i thought. You see, I was old enough to know that with the exception of your movies being shown on TV, that your visibility had seemed to completely disintegrate. Coincidentally, this was also about the time I became aware of 1986’s The Fly, of which I was quite disgusted. To this day I still can’t shake off that last sequence where Geena Davis blows your brains out with a shotgun. Thanks for that.

However, thanks to Saturday Night Live (which for our younger readers is a program that used to be funny), we were provided with at least one bit for the Jeff Goldblum highlight reel, by way of Will Ferrel’s hilarious rendition of Cubs announcer Harry Caray.

Despite briefs moments of Goldblum gold through the beginning of the new millennium, I once again found myself disgusted with the lack of presence of a figure who had always proved to be so entertaining throughout my childhood. And then, in 2004 it seemed that the skies had opened up and God was smiling down on us all. Reintroduced to you by your role in Wes Anderson’s The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou, I marveled not only at the fact the all the subtle quirkiness seemed to still shine through after all those years, but that the sense of humor seemed to have matured with me to an intriguing new level. With Life Aquatic I thought to myself, “Jeff Goldblum fits perfectly into the tone of this movie,” and I was excited at the prospect of not only a continuation in that vein, but of a second golden age for one of my favorite actors.

But atlas, perhaps it wasn’t in the cards. I waited and waited for the amazing follow up role to match the greatness of Life Aquatic, but it didn’t come. And then, in 2007, NBC brought me “Raines”, and I thought, “OK, this isn’t what I wanted for Goldblum, but I’ll give it a shot.” Seven episodes in it was canceled, and so were my dreams. You deserved better.

However, I know that somewhere Jeff Goldblum is still out there. From time to time I still see him on classic appearances on shows like Conan that leave me in stitches, and it for this reason, that I would like to humbly put forth a few points of advice for one of the greats. Jeff, the country needs you:.


Three Humble Reccomendations

1. 2009’s Adam Resurrected looks to be shaping up well for you. I’m extremely interested by both the subject matter and the prospect of a Jeff Goldblum/ Willem Dafoe dual ticket. I’m not too familiar with Paul Schrader as a director, but the man wrote The Last Temptation of Christ, Raging Bull, and Taxi Driver, so I’d say he’s got some credentials.

2. While Life Aquatic may not have served as the heralding reintroduction that I had hoped for, I still believe that it was a very interesting and well-suited avenue for you, and I would love to see you explore it further. Who knows, as much as Wes Anderson tends to reuse his cast members, there might just be a part for you in one of his future films.

3. Finally, I know that you are a serious actor, but if you still have that stomach for it I believe there may finally be room for you to return to the magical summer movie blockbuster realm. It may seem like a stretch to some, but you have a proven track record of likability, and hell, if Robert Downey Jr. can be reborn into the good graces of hollywood, then I’d say that there’s probably room for you too. Leave Geena Davis at home though. But seriously, it would seem to be that in a Hollywood where the comedic circles of thought are currently divided into two polar camps, with the excessive shock value of the Apatow/Rogen camp on one side, and what has become the inanely numbing repetitiveness of the Ferrel/Stiller camp on the other, that the art of quirky, subtle, oddball humor that you have come to represent is something that is completely lost on them. As always, we need more Goldblum.

I tried very hard to enjoy 2007's Transformers, but director Michael Bay effortlessly thwarted my very best intentions at every turn by matching every cool aspect of the movie shot for shot with twice as much absurdity and campy pointlessness. Accordingly, as everyone else seems rapt with expectation for the 2009 followup Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen, I'm finding myself prepped for disappointment. The following is list of three improvements upon the original necessary for me to walk into the sequel with even a remotely positive attitude, each of which is met by Michael Bay promptly shitting in my face.

1. No gaping plot holes -- In the original film it is revealed that Megatron's master plan was to use the Allspark to turn Earth's technology into a new army of decepticons. However, Megatron crash-landed on Earth and became encased in ice over 1000 years before any of that technology existed, and was actually used as the blueprint that allowed humanity to create all of that technology that he supposedly planned to turn against them in the first place. What the fuck?

Any hope of a coherent plot for the sequel?
TFW2005 has confirmed that the silver/gray customized hardtop Pontiac Solstice GXP vehicle prop has been spotted on the set of the new film, suggesting the return of autobot Jazz, despite the fact that he but torn in half by Megatron at the end of the first film. Hmmm.

+/- More Ranting

2. No John Turturro -- Believe me, it absolutely pains me to say this as I am a fervent fan of the bulk of his work, but John Turturro's Agent Simmons was one of the worst characters of all time. Turturro's character was so absurd that he felt like a fucking cartoon. Here was this ridiculously inept, bumbling idiot, who had also been put in charge of the world's most top secret program, and Bay took every opportunity possible to hammer it into our skulls.

Has Simmons been deservingly written out of the sequel?
Nope, still in it. Shit.

3. Actual Transformer character development -- For being a movie about robots, Transformers featured only the shallowest of character development for the autobot protagonists, while the decepticons received no attention whatsoever. The movie is called Transformers, not "Shia LaBeouf is a bitch for 2 hours". And besides, the deeper parts should go to the better actors anyway. (Yes, I'm talking about the fucking CGI robots)

So, will the sequel make time for more individual robot attention? Take it away screenwriter Robert Orci:
"I'd love and think we could almost barely manage ten on each side, with some front and center and others as more supporting." Ten plus ten equals TWENTY. Fuck me.


Oh well, if it's bad enough I'll just react the same way I did to Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull....... pretend it doesn't exist.

Review: City of Men


The Skinny: Lifelong friends Acerola (Douglas Silva) and Laranjinha (Darlan Cunha) struggle to survive in the midst of brutal gang warfare while discovering things about their fathers’ secret pasts that have the potential to shatter their friendship forever. 2007’s City of Men offers another visceral look into to the lives of impoverished Brazilians living in the favelas of Rio de Janeiro. Directed by Paulo Morelli, City of Men is a companion to 2002’s City of God, and a continuation of a TV series of the same name. The movie contains some flashbacks to events of the TV series, but all of them are fairly contextual and the plot of the movie itself is completely self-contained. The cinematography doesn’t quite live up that of it’s predecessor, but production value is still very high and the story itself is fast-paced and compelling. In Portugese with English subtitles.
+/- Full Review

Acerola, or “Ace”, is a husband and father in the body of a scared eighteen year old boy. He misses his childhood and fears the immense responsibility and expectation being thrust upon him. Neither he nor his best friend Laranjinha ever had a father, but Laranjinha is especially haunted by the absence of the father whose name he doesn’t even know. The fact that neither boy has a father is endemic of the gang warfare culture in which they live. The women are left to stay at home while the men kill each other in the streets. Ace and Laranjinha are unsure and reluctant young men in a slum where ever other kid their age is pointing a gun at someone. When a power struggle erupts between gang boss Midnight, who happens to be Laranjinha’s cousin, and a top lieutenant, the two find themselves in the midst of a deadly game of king of the hill that will leave no family unscathed.

City of Men differs from City of God both stylistically and in narrative structure. City of God was done in a faux-documentary style, shot with handheld cameras and utilizing lots of quick cuts. This had the dual effect of making the action both visceral and eerily detached. The style fit the narrative quite well as it focused much more on the evolution on the gang culture over the course of several generations. In comparison, City of Men is structured in a much more traditional narrative centered around the friendship of Ace Laranjinha, with the cinematography structured likewise. Additionally, the sheer nihilistic brutality of the violence in City of God has been toned down a bit for City of Men, as is the level of drug use, which is virtually nonexistent in City of Men. It’s strictly personal preference, but I have to say that I prefer the style of City of God, simply due to the frightening degree of realism for which it allows. Regardless, both films are alike in that they harbor absolutely zero sympathetic or romantic notions toward death. There are no epic gun battles here. People get shot. People die. That’s it.

Any minor gripes do not subvert the fact that this film is a rich and entertaining experience that is very much worth your time. The characters in this film are dealing with all the same stresses and pains of day-to-day life and growing up, with the added intensity that every time they leave their house they risk the danger of catching a stray bullet. If you enjoyed City of God, you will enjoy this movie. If you haven’t seen either, see City of God first, then this, and chances are you’ll enjoy the hell out of both of them. If you’re hungry for even more, you can also track down the acclaimed TV series which is available stateside on DVD.